July 9, 2025 | 18:58 GMT +7

  • Click to copy
Tuesday- 13:30, 16/11/2021

Biden's ideological misuse of agriculture funding

(VAN) The Biden administration is jockeying to create a climate change slush fund. It would allow the government to pour as much as $15 billion into new climate programs.
A volunteer loads food into a car at an Armed Services YMCA food distribution, Oct. 28, 2021, in San Diego. As many of 160,000 active duty military members are having trouble feeding their families, according to Feeding America, which coordinates the work of more than 200 food banks around the country. Photo: AP

A volunteer loads food into a car at an Armed Services YMCA food distribution, Oct. 28, 2021, in San Diego. As many of 160,000 active duty military members are having trouble feeding their families, according to Feeding America, which coordinates the work of more than 200 food banks around the country. Photo: AP

Without, that is, bothering to get congressional approval of either the programs or the expenditures.

The scheme starts with the Commodity Credit Corporation. A funding mechanism for federal agricultural programs, the CCC has been around for nearly 90 years. In simple terms, it can spend up to $30 billion a year on agricultural programs. Much of this money is reserved for funding price-support programs and other initiatives authorized through farm bills. But Section 5 of the Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act gives the agriculture secretary significant discretion to spend nondesignated money on a whim.

In general, this discretionary spending power hasn’t been used to any significant extent. From 2012 to 2017, Congress even expressly limited the agriculture secretary’s ability to use this discretionary spending authority. This all changed in 2018 and 2019 when the Department of Agriculture, through the CCC, gave $28 billion of trade aid to farmers. That took the use of the discretionary power under the CCC to a whole new level and, in so doing, set a terrible precedent .

This brings us to where we are now. The Biden administration is trying to use this broad discretionary power to push its climate change agenda.

It’s trying to get around Congress to create a new program out of whole cloth, what it calls the Climate-Smart Agriculture and Forestry Program . While the details of this program are sketchy, it’s basically a way to push certain agricultural practices onto farmers to achieve the administration’s climate goals. But the administration has a problem. While Section 5 of the Charter Act gives the agriculture secretary a great deal of discretionary spending power, it doesn’t permit the CCC to create this program.

The Charter Act clearly states that the CCC can use its powers only to "[c]arry out conservation or environmental programs authorized by law" (emphasis added). And the administration’s proposed climate change program hasn’t been authorized by law.

In a recent notice seeking comments on the program, the CCC doesn’t even try to say it has authority to create the program through the actual environmental provision in the Charter Act. In fact, it doesn’t even mention the environmental provision, likely because it knows mentioning it would be fatal to the effort. Instead, it claims that it can create the program because there’s a provision in the statute about helping to market commodities.

According to the CCC, it would be helping to market "climate-smart commodities." Of course, these are just existing commodities that would be produced according to the ideologically preferred agricultural practices of the Biden administration.

To get around the plain language of the Charter Act, the administration is effectively saying that it can create an unauthorized environmental program so long as it can claim an environmental program will somehow help market commodities. Despite all of Biden's legal gymnastics, however, the program is still an environmental program. And the only way to claim authority for this program or any other unauthorized climate program is to pretend the environmental provision in the Charter Act doesn’t exist.

So, what needs to be done?

Up until recently, Congress passed policy riders through appropriations bills to make sure the agriculture secretary didn’t abuse this discretionary power and create a slush fund. Congress properly recognized that it shouldn’t abrogate its spending power and allow an administration to use the CCC as a slush fund to advance its agenda unilaterally.

Congress needs to go back to those practices. That would keep the administration from operating an unauthorized climate change slush fund. More importantly, it would ensure that legislators, not the agriculture secretary, are the ones deciding how to spend billions of taxpayer dollars every year.

Tr.D

(Washingtonexaminer)

Illegal loggers profit from Brazil’s carbon credit projects

Illegal loggers profit from Brazil’s carbon credit projects

(VAN) How a system designed to protect the world’s biggest rainforest is funding businesses with a track record of illegal deforestation.

Cage-free countdown: UK retailers face 2025 deadline

Cage-free countdown: UK retailers face 2025 deadline

(VAN) Pressure is growing on companies to adopt the cage-free commitment for their egg supplies. Many food companies said their eggs would be from cage-free systems by the end of this year (2025).

Droughts worldwide pushing tens of millions towards starvation

Droughts worldwide pushing tens of millions towards starvation

(VAN) Water shortages hitting crops, energy and health as crisis gathers pace amid climate breakdown.

Green Climate Fund approves a record $300 million for FAO-designed projects in Papua New Guinea, Saint Lucia and the Sahel

Green Climate Fund approves a record $300 million for FAO-designed projects in Papua New Guinea, Saint Lucia and the Sahel

(VAN) The initiatives focus on forestry management, fisheries transformation and land restoration.

FAO urges collective action for food security, climate and development challenges in Africa.

FAO urges collective action for food security, climate and development challenges in Africa.

(VAN) Director-General QU Dongyu addresses the 6th AU-EU Agriculture Ministerial Conference.

Science meets soil: High-tech solutions elevate China's agricultural development

Science meets soil: High-tech solutions elevate China's agricultural development

(VAN) In the suburbs of Beijing, there is an agricultural center spanning over 150 hectares dedicated to research, demonstration, and application of high-tech and precision agriculture.

Plant-derived fertilizer additive boosts yields and cuts emissions

Plant-derived fertilizer additive boosts yields and cuts emissions

(VAN) Researchers from the Institute of Applied Ecology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences have developed a new environmentally friendly fertilizer additive that significantly enhances crop yields while reducing emissions of harmful gases.

Read more